In its judgement of August 5, 2005, the Supreme Court of India admitted that the evidence against Afzal was only circumstantial, and that there was no evidence that he belonged to any terrorist group or organisation.
The court however believed that, the incident, which resulted in heavy casualties, had shaken the entire nation and the collective conscience of the society will only be satisfied if capital punishment is awarded to the accused.
The court however believed that, the incident, which resulted in heavy casualties, had shaken the entire nation and the collective conscience of the society will only be satisfied if capital punishment is awarded to the accused.
No comments:
Post a Comment
You agree or disagree with my view, please feel free to express your opinion about this post!